Well, asleif_dufansdottir said it a little more...umm...
harshly perhaps than I did, but the spirit of what she has to say rings very true. It's good advice, Tuesday, if you can take it.
While I'm on the subject of which advice to take in this thread, I have to say that I was quite surprised by some of the responses to Tuesday's original plea. (Warning: this is the part where I'm going to say something I wasn't going to, but just can't help myself...)
I have a difficult time seeing how people who are not, or have never been, married can hand out such definitive advice about how someone else should handle their marriage. But, they may say, I have lived with someone/I have been in long term relationships with similar issues/I am engaged/etc., and that qualifies me to dole out marriage advice, after all it's pretty much the same, right?
Wrong. As much as you might think differently, a marriage is a different animal than a non-marital relationship. The very existence of the legal bond that exists between the two people involved--even down to the ceremony of public promises made before entering into it--creates a situation that is decidedly different in that the dissolution of the relationship is logistically and (yes, I'm going to say it) emotionally a more difficult process..
If I was seeking advice about my visit to France and asking for advice from people who lived there or who had been there as to what I should see or do, or what to avoid and someone said to me "I've never been to France, but I've read books about it and I have been to Quebec which is as close as you can get to experiencing French culture without actually going to France so you should do..." would I think their advice was sound and reliable? If I wanted advice about parenting, and someone said "I don't have any kids, but I have lots of nieces and nephews and they've done some of the same thing your child is doing and I would handle it by..." I would wonder how on earth they could hand out such definitive advice so cavalierly.
I hold myself to this same standard. For example: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a JW. My experience is peripheral through my family, and I have been affected by their policies and practices through them (see my profile for an explanation). I know a great deal about their practices, doctrines and history, but I do not know how it feels to actually be a witness or ex-witness. Hence, if someone asked other ex-witnesses for JW-related advice, I wouldn't be jumping up and down to hand out solutions to their problems.
I wish Tuesday luck in sifting through the responses and determining which advice to trust and follow.